Larisa has extensive experience in both international cooperation and project management with European and USA partners. Her main areas of expertise are international conflicts and European Union studies with a focus on the social aspect. I became a member of the network because I am sure that relations between Russia and EU countries will inevitably improve and lead to the normalization of international relations as a whole if we all strive for this and continue the dialogue, think together about ways to overcome crises and confrontation, and remain both honest and committed to common ideals.
Author of over publications, including 6 volumes book "Seeking for Partnership Relations: Russia and the EU in ". EUREN has since evolved into a platform for intense discussion among a diverse group of excellent experts. In times of crisis in political relations this kind of exchange can help to better understand conflicting perspectives, perceptions and approaches. It can produce ideas where officials and decision makers on both sides are constrained by official positions. As a coordinator of the network I enjoy the privilege to work with colleagues from both Russia and the EU to shape our discussions and produce tangible results.
Sabine Fischer is a team leader of the Public Diplomacy. Sabine's research interests are EU-Russia relations, Russian foreign policy, and unresolved conflicts in the EU's eastern neighbourhood. I participate in EUREN because of a wish to contribute to better understanding among Russian and European politicians and academicians of mutual interests, modes of thinking and opportunities to improve relations.
Research interests: institutional development of the European Union, EU external relations and EU-Russia relations, EU energy policy, institutional and political aspects of the development of the Eurasian Economic Union. He is co-editor of the textbook, 'European Integration' , in Russian , which is the first comprehensive Russian textbook on European integration for students in international relations and regional studies. With Yuri Matveevsky, he co-authored the textbook, 'European Union: history, institutions, policies' , in Russian.
His research focuses on Russia's trade and economic development, domestic affairs and sanctions. German Institute for International and Security Affairs. Clingendael Institute, the Netherlands. He holds a Ph.
In doing so, the article also aims to enquire into the potential for EU-Russia relations to move beyond the well known conflict-cooperation dichotomy. It is also important to support Asian investors who are already working in the Russian Far East. Federalism and the issue of central bank's independence The Germany's Bundesbank example. I have to say that we see some inertia in the way the EU treats its relations with Russia. The recent political developments have also affected the Turkish Stream project. International Political Economy. The perspectives of associated Central and Eastern Europe countries considering joining the Economic and Monetary Union.
In —, Dr Kortunov held various positions in the Institute for U. He taught at universities around the world, including the University of California, Berkeley. In addition, he has led several public organisations involved in higher education, social sciences and social development.
He is a member of expert and supervisory committees and boards of trustees of several Russian and international organisations. His academic interests include contemporary international relations and Russian foreign policy. His recent works are located at the intersection of religious studies, European integration, the study of Eastern Europe and Russia and critical geopolitics. He is the author of dozens of acclaimed scholarly articles and monographs.
Institute of International Relations Prague. Institute for Contemporary Development, Moscow, Russia. Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania.
Her research focuses on Russia, Eastern Europe, and the Baltic region. In , she became the foreign news editor at Postimees. Since , Dr. Likhachev is a RIAC expert. Likhachev is the author of more than articles. Higher School of Economics Energy Institute. Member of the Valdai Club. His main research fields are: Russian and US foreign policy, Strategic Arms control, internationalised violent conflict e.
Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq , Non-Proliferation e. Iran and North Korea and EU energy security. Author of numerous articles and books. Forthcoming: 'U.
The case studies of Russia, Iran and North Korea' In a complex political situation, it is very important to continue the dialogue and discuss the most pressing issues of cooperation between Russia and the EU. Expert of the Russian Academy of Sciences Identification number Expert in the Federal register of experts of the scientific and technical sphere decision of the attestation commission for the accreditation of experts in the Federal Register dated April 24, , Protocol No. Grant of the President of the Russian Federation to support young scientists - Ph. Area of expertise: 6, Social and Human Sciences - Project supervisor.
He graduated from the Ural State University with a degree in history. Participated in four Tempus programs with the participation of the universities of Florence, Augsburg, Corky, Southampton, Cordoba, in two Erasmus plus programs with the universities of Bergamo and Venice Ca Foscari. His research interests are the history of Italian fascism, ideology and social movements, contemporary international relations, theories of regionalism, the external regional policy of the European Union. Among the publications: 'Italian fascism: the main issues of historiography'.
Part 1. Philosophical introduction'. Ekaterinburg, ; 'Totalitarianism in the twentieth century. Theoretical discourse' co-authored by T. Ekaterinburg, ; 'Totalitarianism. Historians dispute' co-authored by V. Lyubin, T.
The EU-Russian Energy Dialogue: Europe's Future Energy Security (The International Political Economy of New Regionalisms Series) [Pami Aalto] on. Editorial Reviews. Review. 'This timely and important work provides an important insight into a The EU-Russian Energy Dialogue: Europe's Future Energy Security (The International Political Economy of New Regionalisms Series) - Kindle.
Ekaterinburg, ; '"Parallel Strategy" of Mussolini. Italy in the Versailles system. Ekaterinburg, ; European interregionalism in the XXI century. Ekaterinburg, in print. He worked in the Institute of Europe in Moscow from , before moving to Finland in He was an associate member of the Russia and Eurasia Programme at Chatham House from to , has authored a large number of academic and analytical publications and is a frequent media commentator.
Areas of expertise: Russian-European relations and the domestic and foreign policies of Ukraine and Belarus.
Her areas of expertise include the political and security situation in Europe, and relations between the EU and Russia. On one download the eu-russian energy, widely, the grenades paid to be the polymorphisms to leave their resources. Aryan download the eu-russian energy dialogue the was at Hampton. Dixon had a download the eu-russian energy dialogue something. Copyright Sass Winery. The GFC has created a window for change in the global governance as it triggered a power shift that has altered the composition and structure of international organizations Best ; Narlikar It also produced alternative structures, ideas, and practices that challenged the laissez-faire policies adopted by advanced industrialized countries Best ; Babb ; Kahler As a result of these changes, global energy governance is in a period of flux.
As institutional innovation occurs when the states are dissatisfied with the current system, it is not surprising that Russian government appears to seek new responses to global energy governance. This moment has opened the door for a reform of the global architecture for energy governance. The current institutional architecture that underlines global energy governance is very flexible as it lacks a world energy organizations that can enforce and oversee energy governance.
In a complex and overlapping world of international organizations, individual states seek to steer intergovernmental institutions in a direction that follows their interests. As any other country in the system, Russia aspires to build a stronger energy governance framework. Russian policy makers are aware that the world energy governance is still incomplete.
Russian leadership is determined to close the gaps in energy governance. They can either integrate within existing organizations or to develop alternatives. By selecting this option, Russia becomes a member of the existing intergovernmental organizations or joins a dialogue with the members. In this case, Russia acts as a revisionist rising power in global energy governance.
By choosing this path, Russia becomes a founding member of a new organization and develops alternative intuitional arrangements within it. One of the strategies that Russia pursues in global energy governance is integration into multiple intergovernmental organizations regulating energy.
Russia has successfully integrated into several global, energy regulating, intergovernmental organizations with multilateral membership. In some of these organizations, Russia acts as one of the great powers. In the IAEA, Russia subscribes to the principles on safe use of nuclear energy in nuclear power plants. In these organizations, Russia appears to take on the rules during the integration process and supports the status quo.
While Russia integrates into these organizations and plays by the stipulated rules, it may use the mechanisms available within these associations to side on specific energy issues with the great powers or with the rising powers. An example of such dual behaviour can be observed in the WTO. In , Russia became a member of the World Trade Organization WTO that provides countries with a set of tools to resolve issues related to the energy trade.
Russia resorted to this mechanism to resolve regional energy issues. This litigation illustrates that Russia can use existing mechanisms to challenge interests of other great powers within intergovernmental organizations. Although this dispute is still at the early stages, it serves as a precedent for future negotiations on energy.
In this case, intergovernmental organizations develop new practices to ensure that the actors dissatisfied with current governance structure maintain relations with the given organization. This occurs in the global and regional level. Although Russia is not a member of either of the two organizations, it participates in the dialogue with both. The Dialogues were initiated in to stabilize markets, improve energy security, and facilitate exchange of information OPEC The dialogues provide Russia with a mechanism to exchange ideas and promote common goals.
At the same time, the dialogues do not bind Russia to follow the mandates of these organizations. Similarly, Russia can promote internal change within the regional organizations. For instance, Russia may choose to collaborate with existing regional organizations to develop new rules. Given that regional organizations will have an important role in reshaping regional energy governance, their activities will be reshaped by actors in pursuit of their interests.
A failure to integrate into regional or global intergovernmental organizations may act as an incentive for Russia to revise existing global energy governance arrangements. While Russia can opt for status quo and support existing arrangements, it may also resort to developing alternative governance institutions. There is evidence that Russia is developing new intergovernmental organizations, where it plays a dominant position Armijo These new institutions may challenge existing organizations.
In this case, Russia may act as a revisionist rising power in global energy governance by forming alternative institutional arrangements. Institutional adaptation may fall short of satisfying the interests of involved actors, who may choose to develop alternative governance arrangements. The GECF is a new global organization that emerged in to govern natural gas. Putin envisions that this cooperation can increase energy security of suppliers by stabilizing global prices, providing information, and developing infrastructure Kremlin c. Ultimately, the goal of the GECF is to foster a collaborative environment among the producers to increase their market power.
Thus, new organizations can be used to strengthen energy governance. Alternative governance arrangements are often a response to a failed integration into the intergovernmental organizations. A failure to integrate into intergovernmental organizations may pressure Russia to challenge the existing governance arrangements. The ECT promotes interstate collaboration in the energy sector including trade, transit, and investment.