sme.ltd.uk/1058.php Aristar, Anthony R. On diachronic sources and synchronic pattern: An investigation into the origin of linguistic universals. Language 67 1. Synchronic versus diachronic explanation and the nature of the Language Faculty. Annual Review of Linguistics 2 1. Exploring diachronic universals of agreement: Alignment patterns and zero marking across person categories. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Blevins, Juliette. Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bybee, Joan L. The diachronic dimension in explanation.
In John A. Hawkins ed. Oxford: Blackwell. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world.
Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Bybee, Joan. Language change and universals.
The distribution of these two word order patterns for the give-type double-object construction is asymmetrical across the Chinese dialects: The Northern dialects have the IO DO pattern39 while the Southern dialects mainly have the DO IO pattern. The upper horizontal stroke depicts a fixed point. It is possible that works published outside China may be influenced by English or their local languages. In 36 , 37 , and 38 , —tu and —nu appear with actions that just happened at utterance time. In Faits de Langues Miminashi fight…. See also A.
Formal universals as emergent phenomena: The origins of structure preservation. In Jeff Good ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Creissels, Denis.
Direct and indirect explanations of typological regularities: The case of alignment variations. Folia Linguistica 42 1. Cristofaro, Sonia. Semantic maps and mental representation. Linguistic Discovery 8 1. The referential hierarchy: Reviewing the evidence in diachronic perspective.
Greenberg, Joseph H. Some methods of dynamic comparison in linguistics. In Jan Puhvel ed.
Berkeley: University of California Press. Diachrony, synchrony and language universals. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Haspelmath, Martin. On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
The puzzle of monogamous marriage. B Paciotti, B.
Plank, Frans. Extent and limits of linguistic diversity as the remit of typology — but through constraints on what is diversity limited? Linguistic Typology 11 1.
More Posts. Pingback: Coexpression patterns of complementizers, nanosyntax, and productivity Diversity Linguistics Comment.
Pingback: An interview with Sonia Cristofaro about diachronic change and typological explanation Diversity Linguistics Comment. Thank you for these thoughts Martin. Structurally, their surface syntax is comparable in the crucial respects, and they exhibit analogous properties with respect to argument structure, scope of tense-aspect marking and polarity.
More tellingly, however, they share a precisely analogous diachronic origin and functional motivation for their development, as well as serve as a primary channel for the recruitment of new grammatical morphemes. Although in terms of frequency distribution, as well as sheer number of functions handled, verb-serialization appears far deeper in more prototypical verb-serializing languages such as Lahu or Akan, these differences should probably be understood in terms of typological constraints on their development rather than as differences of kind per se.
The paper has the following structure: section 2 briefly discusses some typological features of Assamese with reference to contact in the Northeast Indian linguistic area. Sections 3 and 4 review the synchronic and diachronic characteristics respectively of serial verb constructions in languages commonly identified as having them.
Section 5 then reviews the major structural and semantic features of the Assamese serial verb construction. Section 6 concludes the presentation.