If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to retrieve your username. Tools Request permission Export citation Add to favorites Track citation. Share Give access Share full text access.
Share full text access. Please review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.
Get access to the full version of this article. View access options below. You previously purchased this article through ReadCube. Institutional Login. Log in to Wiley Online Library. Purchase Instant Access.
View Preview. Learn more Check out.
Volume 79 , Issue 1 Spring Pages Related Information. Close Figure Viewer. Browse All Figures Return to Figure. Previous Figure Next Figure. Email or Customer ID. Alexander the Great, like Cleopatra VII Philopator the last of the Ptolemies , is the subject of a seemingly never-ending stream of monographs and articles. The present book is one of those titles that comes as something of a refreshing oasis amid the treasures and dreck of so crowded a bibliography; it invites a reappraisal and reconsideration of assumptions both hasty and cherished.
This volume is both monograph and reader; it is both a commentary on and a challenge to other treatments of both Alexander and his most celebrated foe.
Briant's book is not a biography of Darius per se but rather a detailed treatment of how the Darius of the Greek and Roman historical tradition in particular came to be--in other words, a scholarly commentary on how authors like Arrian and Curtius Rufus came to depict the storied Persian monarch as they did. And beyond the rather well-trodden paths of the Anabasis and the Historiae, Briant devotes considerable attention to the challenging world of the Alexander romance tradition and to the vast field of Iranian literature that is largely unknown to most classical scholars.
Authors both major and minor are treated e.
Influenced by the "Alexander Romance" as they are, even the medieval Persian sources are not free of harsh prejudices against the king D r, whom they deemed deficient in the traditional kingly virtues. New copy - Usually dispatched within 2 working days. Submit vote Cancel. The book is a magnificent work of classical scholarship, and Briant rewards readers with insights the source authors either failed to see or deliberately omitted. Cancel Post.
Archaeologists will find much to enjoy in the discussion of the remains of material culture and excavation work of relevance to a study of the sometimes seemingly shadowy Darius; everywhere the word that most often came to this reviewer's mind was "comprehensive," indeed l'integral. The impressive range of Quellenforschung on display here makes Briant's work a valuable resource not only for those interested in Persian history but also for students of the relationship of Rome and Parthia and indeed for medieval scholars of the Alexander tradition and of Alexander lore.
The general bibliography alone is worth the modest price of the volume. In the course of this book, students gain a useful education in Greek historiography in particular, as well as in the problems of ancient biography and the relationship between history and the composition of vitae on difficult historical personages. An unknown error has occurred.