Andrew Guthrie Ferguson, Malcolm Gladwell, Michael Greenacre, Correspondence analysis in practice.
Critical Studies on Terrorism, 5 3 , They are secret in their design and consist of proprietary data in a commercial and government context, such as credit rating in the financial sector, or they are found in closed government databases. This article presents a case study of the recently conceived and ongoing counter-extremism campaign, Voices Against Extremism, a campaign designed and implemented by university students from Vancouver, Canada. Stability , 2 3 , Article Raphael Bossong. Write your review. These projects provided an insight into the technical possibilities of predicting terrorist attacks.
Second edition. Boca Raton, Fla. Samuel Greengard, Cory P. Haberman and Jerry H. Ratcliffe, Bernard E. Harcourt, Against prediction: Profiling, policing, and punishing in an actuarial age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Michael V. Hayden, Playing to the edge: American intelligence in the age of terror. New York: Penguin Press. Charlotte Heath-Kelly, John Horgan, London: Routledge, pp. IBM, PDF , accessed 7 August David Jensen, Jeff Jonas and Jim Harper, Mareile Kaufmann, Ethnic profiling and counter-terrorism: Examples of European practice and possible repercussions.
Hamburger Studien zur Kriminologie und Kriminalpolitik , band Berlin: LIT Verlag. Rob Kitchin, a. Rob Kitchin, b. The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. Thousand Oaks, Calif. Kate Knibbs, Susanne Krasmann, Scott Lash, a. Scott Lash, b. Cynthia Lum, Leslie W.
Kennedy and Alison Sherley, David Lyon and Elia Zureik editors , Computers, surveillance, and privacy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Adrian Mackenzie, Astrid Mager, Andreas Matthias, Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think.
Social Networks, Terrorism, and Counter-Terrorism: Radical and Connected .. The sub- title of the book, Radical and Connected, captures in. Social Networks, Terrorism and Counter-terrorism: Radical and Connected, 1st process and counter-terrorism policies, through the lens of social networks.
Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Colleen McCue, Data mining and predictive analysis: Intelligence gathering and crime analysis. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. Jenna McLaughlin, McMorrow, Christopher Mims, Evgeny Morozov, London: Allen Lane. Philip M. Napoli, Graeme Newman, Ronald V. Clarke and S.
Giora Shoham editors , Rational choice and situational crime prevention: Theoretical foundations. Aldershot: Ashgate. Alan Norrie, Von Hirsch, D. Garland and A. Doran and J. Eli Pariser, The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. London: Penguin. Frank Pasquale, The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Cambridge, Mass.
Albert Rosen, Danny Rosenthal, David C. Sandomir, Frederick F. Schauer, Profiles, probabilities, and stereotypes. Bruce Schneier, Data and Goliath: The hidden battles to collect your data and control your world. New York: Norton. Michael Shaoul, Eric Siegel, Predictive analytics: The power to predict who will click, buy, lie, or die. Hoboken, N. Nate Silver. London: Penguin Books. Paul Sperry, Ben Taub, Alan Travis, Patrick Tucker, a. Patrick Tucker, b. Patrick Tucker, The naked future: What happens in a world that anticipates your every move? Zeynep Tufekci, John Tukey, Emma Uprichard, Leanne Weber and Ben Bowling editors , Stop and search: Police power in global context.
Abingdon: Routledge. Tal Z. Zarsky, So the probability that an individual under surveillance is also a terrorist is also extremely low [ Chivers, Mims, The German dragnet investigation, for example, proved largely unsuccessful. The profiling parameters were widened so much that they were finally useless: 8. Much of the thinking about the terrorist is still rooted in assumptions about profiling, while simultaneously hinting at the sense of frustration that no terrorist profile has yet been found — not only between members of different terrorist movements but also among members of the same particular movement [ Holding radical views, providing that they are promoted in non-violent ways, is not in itself normally regarded as incompatible with membership of a democratic free society [ Where is the tipping point?
The producers or media outlets are in competition with other media outlets to supply their constituents with the most up-to-date information.
This network of fixed gazes' is both "privileged and imperative" for the system to satisfy the status quo. Consumers looks to media outlets to provide news on terrorism. If consumers believe terrorism is a threat to their safety, they want to be informed of the threats against them. Media outlets fulfill their viewers' needs, and portray terrorism as a threat because of the cycle that surveillance engenders.
As terrorism flourishes as a prominent discourse of fear, consumers want information faster because they feel their safe being is in peril. The idea of total surveillance, as prescribed by Foucault, becomes a cycle where the disruption of power causes scrutiny by various players in system. If the media-outlets are not constantly looking for stories that fulfill consumer needs, then they are scrutinized. In addition to the surveillance aspect of news dissemination, therein is the notion that "needs" drive the network of power: both the media outlets and consumers have needs that are fulfilled by broadcasting the news.
It is this idea expressed in the uses and gratifications theory. It stipulates that the active audience and the terrorist "seek to satisfy their various needs" through media transmission. Terror groups take to social media because social media tools are cheap and accessible, facilitate quick, broad dissemination of messages, and allow for unfettered communication with an audience without the filter or "selectivity" of mainstream news outlets.
Whereas previously terror groups would release messages via intermediaries, social media platforms allow terror groups to release messages directly to their intended audience and converse with their audience in real time:  Weimann also mentions in "Theater of Terror", that terrorists use the media to promote the theatrical like nature of the premeditated terror. HSMPress is using Twitter the way social media experts have always advised- not just broadcasting, but engaging in conversation.
Spend some time following the account, and you realize that you're dealing with a real human being with real ideas—albeit boastful, hypocritical, violent ideas. Al-Qaeda has been noted as being one of the terror groups that uses social media the most extensively. While almost all terrorist organizations have websites, al Qaeda is the first to fully exploit the internet.
This reflects al Qaeda's unique characteristics. It regards itself as a global movement and therefore depends on a global communications network to reach its perceived constituents. It sees its mission as not simply creating terror among its foes but awakening the Muslim community. Its leaders view communications as 90 percent of the struggle. Despite the risks imposed by intense manhunts, its leaders communicate regularly with video and audio messages, which are posted on its websites and disseminated on the Internet.
The number of websites devoted to the al Qaeda-inspired movement has grown from a handful to reportedly thousands, although many of these are ephemeral. Known terrorist group the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant , also translated to ISIS , uses the widespread of news over social media to their advantage when releasing threatening videos of beheadings. As of November 16, , following the beheading of former U. Army Ranger Peter Kassig , there have now been five recorded executions of Westerners taken captive in Syria.
The videos of the brutal beheadings are both posted online by ISIS, where they can be viewed by anyone using their own discretion, and sent to government officials as threats. Posting the executions online gives the terrorist groups the power to manipulate viewers and cause havoc among the population viewing them,  and the videos have the ability to instill fear within the Western world.
The videos are typically high production quality and generally show the entirety of the gruesome act, with the hostage speaking a few words before they are killed on camera. In the case of U. In addition to beheading videos, ISIS has released videos of their members doing nonviolent acts. For example, Imran Awan described one such instance in his article "Cyber-Extremism: Isis and the Power of Social Media" where one video showed members of the Islamic State were seen helping people and visiting hospitals.
Edgar Jones has mentioned in his article, "The Reception of Broadcast Terrorism: Recruitment and Radicalisation," that ISIS has utilized documentaries and even their own magazine, Dabiq, in order to recruit new members and to get their message out to the public. According to Wainwright, social media is also used by ISIS and other terror groups to recruit foreign people to join the terrorist cause.
In some cases, these new recruits are sent back to their home country to carry out terrorist attacks.
Others who can not physically move to the terrorist cause have been known to carry out acts of terrorism in their own countries due to the propaganda that they are exposed to online. The Taliban has been active on Twitter since May , and has more than 7, followers. Tweeting under the handle alemarahweb, the Taliban tweets frequently, on some days nearly hourly.
This account is currently suspended.
Shortly after a series of coordinated Christmas bombings in Kono , Nigeria , in , the Nigerian-based terror group Boko Haram released a video statement defending their actions to YouTube. Islamic State has emerged as one of the most potent users of social media. However, IS quickly eclipsed its mentor, deploying a whole range of narratives, images and political proselytizing through various social media platforms.
However, as the November attacks in Paris demonstrate, IS also uses old-fashioned methods of communication and propaganda.
Lewis notes that the attacks in Paris represent the sort of 'propaganda in action' which was a method developed by the 19th century anarchists in Europe. The November IS attacks were perpetrated without prior warning, largely because the operatives met face-to-face and used other non-digital means of communication. Some U. In particular, Joe Lieberman has been especially vocal in demanding that social media companies not permit terror groups to use their tools. The report stated that the internet is one of the "primary drivers" of the terrorist threat to the United States.
In response to the news that Al-Shabab was using Twitter, U. Twitter executives have not complied with these demands and have declined to comment on the case. In January , Twitter announced changes to their censorship policy, stating that they would now be censoring tweets in certain countries when the tweets risked breaking the local laws of that country.
While neither Sayoc, nor Bowers, has been officially linked with any particular right-wing extremist organizations, both seized upon talking points espoused by such groups which is defined by online trolls, racist activists and hate-filled misogynists. Such connections may come to light in the days and weeks to come, as more is learned about these men and their involvement online.
Neo-Nazis, white supremacists, anti-government militants, and other like-minded organizations have long been a source of anxiety to terrorism analysts who have watched the groups step up violence inside United States in recent years. The Anti-Defamation League, the left-leaning nonprofit that tracks anti-Semitism, found in its annual report that the number of murders conducted by white supremacists in the U.
The report documented how right-wing extremist sentiments shared online often spill into real world, including the march on Charlottesville, Va.
Over that time, the report said far-right attacks killed people in the United States, while Islamist-inspired extremists killed However, terrorism in the United States is on the rise. The reason, at least in part, is due to the spate of attacks motivated by far-right extremists. A large part of combating the threat hinges on stopping the spread of terrorist ideology online, the document said.
Since the dawn of the Internet, hate-seekers have been able to find chat rooms or websites in the dark corners of the Web. But the emergence of social media sites, such as Facebook, YouTube and Twitter, has since made hate speech and misinformation far more accessible to anyone with a smart device. The troubling question in the wake of this last surge of violence is whether social media makes attacks by extremists more likely.