click This first principle came to be known as the absolute, because the absolute, or unconditional, must precede all the principles which are conditioned by the difference between one principle and another. Although German idealism is closely related to developments in the intellectual history of Germany in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, such as classicism and romanticism, it is also closely related to larger developments in the history of modern philosophy. Kant, Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel sought to overcome the division between rationalism and empiricism that had emerged during the early modern period.
The way they characterized these tendencies has exerted a lasting influence on the historiography of modern philosophy. Although German idealism itself has been subject to periods of neglect in the last two hundred years, renewed interest in the contributions of the German idealism have made it an important resource for contemporary philosophy.
Kant insisted that this reading misrepresented his position.
While the dogmatic idealist denies the reality of space and time, Kant takes space and time to be forms of intuition. Forms of intuition are, for Kant, the subjective conditions of the possibility of all of our sense perception. It is only because space and time are a priori forms that determine the content of our sensations that Kant thinks we can perceive anything at all. It certainly does not imply that space and time are unreal or that the understanding produces the objects of our cognition by itself. Unfortunately, the endorsements Kant hoped for never arrived.
Kantian Reason and Hegelian Spirit: The Idealistic Logic of Modern Theology [ Gary Dorrien, Robert King Ross] on ykoketomel.ml *FREE* shipping on qualifying . Editorial Reviews. Review. “Graduate students and philosophy of religion students will find this Kantian Reason and Hegelian Spirit: The Idealistic Logic of Modern Theology - Kindle edition by Gary Dorrien. Religion & Spirituality Kindle.
Mendelssohn, in particular, was preoccupied with concerns about his health and the dispute that had arisen between himself and Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi about the alleged Spinozism of his friend Gotthold Ephraim Lessing During the controversy, Jacobi charged that any attempt to demonstrate philosophical truths was fatally flawed.
Jacobi concluded that transcendental idealism, like Spinozism, subordinates the immediate certainty, or faith, through which we know the world, to demonstrative reason, transforming reality into an illusion. Jacobi remained a thorn in the side of the Kantians and the young German idealists, but he was unable to staunch interest in philosophy in general or idealism in particular. In later years, Fichte presented a number of substantially different versions of the Wissenschaftslehre in lectures in Berlin.
When, as a result of a controversy concerning his religious views, Fichte left Jena in , Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von Schelling became the most important idealist in Jena. Schelling had also established close relationships with the Jena romantics, who, despite their great interest in Kant, Reinhold, and Fichte, maintained a more skeptical attitude towards philosophy than the German idealists.
Although Hegel only published three more books during his lifetime, Science of Logic , Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences , and Elements of the Philosophy of Right , he remains the most widely-read and most influential of the German idealists. The German idealists have acquired a reputation for obscurity, because of the length and complexity of many of their works. As a consequence, they are often considered to be obscurantists and irrationalists. The German idealists were, however, neither obscurantists nor irrationalists.
Their contributions to logic are earnest attempts to formulate a modern logic that is consistent with the idealism of their metaphysics and epistemology. Kant was the first of the German idealists to make important contributions to logic. Transcendental logic also differs from general logic because it does not abstract from the content of cognition.
Transcendental logic contains the laws of pure thinking as they pertain to the cognition of objects.
This does not mean that transcendental logic is concerned with empirical objects as such, but rather with the a priori conditions of the possibility of the cognition of objects. Reinhold insisted that the laws of general logic had to be derived from the principle of consciousness if philosophy was to become systematic and scientific, but the possibility of this derivation was contested by Schulze in Aenesidemus. Because the principle of consciousness has to be consistent with basic logical principles like the principle of non-contradiction and the principle of the excluded middle, Schulze concluded that it could not be regarded as a first principle.
The laws of general logic were, it seemed, prior to the principle of consciousness, so that even the Elementarphilosophie presupposed general logic. Logical analysis is always undertaken reflectively, according to Fichte, because it presupposes that consciousness has already been determined in some way. Because Hegel was convinced that truth is both formal and material, and not one or the other, he sought to establish the dialectical unity of the formal and the material in his works on logic. For Hegel, however, this process accounts for the genesis of the categories and concepts through which all cognition is determined.
Logic reveals the unity of that process. German idealism is a form of idealism. The idealism espoused by the German idealists is, however, different from other kinds of idealism with which contemporary philosophers may be more familiar. While earlier idealists maintained that reality is ultimately intellectual rather than material Plato or that the existence of objects is mind-dependent Berkeley , the German idealists reject the distinctions these views presuppose.
Kant holds that the objects of human cognition are transcendentally ideal and empirically real. They are transcendentally ideal, because the conditions of the cognition human beings have of objects are to be found in the cognitive faculties of human beings. This does not mean the existence of those objects is mind-dependent, because Kant thinks we can only know objects to the extent that they are objects for us and, thus, as they appear to us.
Idealism with respect to appearances does not entail the mind-dependence of objects, because it does not commit itself to any claims about the nature of things in themselves. Kant denies that we have any knowledge of things in themselves, because we do not have the capacity to make judgments about the nature of things in themselves based on our knowledge of things as they appear. Despite our ignorance of things in themselves, Kant thought we could have objectively valid cognition of empirically real objects. Kant recognized that we are affected by things outside ourselves and that this affection produces sensations.
The synthesis of matter and form in judgment therefore produces objectively valid cognition of empirically real objects. Fichte, however, maintains the very idea of a thing in itself, a thing which is not an object for us and which exists independently of our consciousness, is a contradiction in terms. There can be no thing in itself, Fichte claims, because a thing is only a thing when it is something for us.
Even the thing in itself is, in fact, a product of our own conscious thought, meaning the thing in itself is nothing other a postulation of our own consciousness. Thus, it is not a thing in itself, but just another object for us.
Project MUSE promotes the creation and dissemination of essential humanities and social science resources through collaboration with libraries, publishers, and scholars worldwide. Forged from a partnership between a university press and a library, Project MUSE is a trusted part of the academic and scholarly community it serves.
Modern theology as an academic discipline has long claimed independence from other disciplines, especially philosophy. After all, Kant himself was not critical of metaphysics per se. A Friendship That Lasted a Lifetime. In general this is how the Logic proceeds: seeking its most basic and universal determination, thought posits a category to be reflected upon, finds then that this collapses due to a contradiction generated, like that generated by the category being, and so then seeks a further category with which to make retrospective senses of those contradictory categories. A Neo-Hegelian Theology.
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content: Ideality, Divine Reality, and Realism. Idealistic theologies are oriented to the question of truth, realistic theologies are oriented to the question of reality, and I believe that theology is inherently idealistic, where the greater danger lies. Postmodernity and Hegelian Idealism The apostles of postmodern anti-theology famously countered that logocentrism is the fatal disease of Western thought. If you would like to authenticate using a different subscribed institution that supports Shibboleth authentication or have your own login and password to Project MUSE.
Additional Information. Imperial Designs grew out of his extensive speaking against the U. Economy, Difference, Empire: Social Ethics for Social Justice features his lectures on economic democracy, racial and gender justice, and anti-imperial politics. His next book, In a Post-Hegelian Spirit: Philosophical Theology as Idealistic Discontent, will be published in by Yale University Press, and he is currently completing a book on the history of American democratic socialism.
Dorrien has taught in recent years as the Horace De Y. Raither Distinguished Scholar at Trinity College. STH faculty are experts in a wide range of fields and represent diverse backgrounds in the church, the academy, faith-based non-profits, and other areas of religious leadership.